What should we build next?
Everything here starts as somebody describing a job they were sick of doing. Send one in, and if it gets built you get the tool, the prompts and the repo, the same as everybody else.
A question, rather than a job
Is this worth automating at all. Am I allowed to put that data in it. Where does somebody who has never done this start. The questions that come up most often turn into published answers, so asking once helps everybody who never got round to it.
Ask about the problem, not the people in it. No company names, no employee names, nothing about a live grievance or investigation. That work belongs with your HR advisers and your lawyers, and a tool built from one case would be no use to anybody else anyway.
Answers are published anonymised where more than one person would find them useful, and never with anything that identifies you or your employer. Nothing here is legal advice, and where a question needs a lawyer the answer will say so.
Every one gets read
One person, no team, no ticketing system. That is the limit on how fast this can move, and it is also why the answers are worth having.
Nothing is published without a yes
If what you sent would make a good build, you get asked first. Silence is a no. Anonymous is always an option and it costs you nothing.
Nothing is sold to anyone
Not to vendors, not as a list, not as research a sponsor paid for. Sponsorship goes through partners@ and never touches this.
The queue is public even when the questions are not
Every build names the problem it came from, so nobody has to take anyone's word for it that requests turn into things.
Nothing has been built from a request yet, because nothing has been published yet. This list fills from the first issue onwards, and it starts empty rather than starting with something invented.